M 42 - Pentax K-5 iso 80 = 3x8 + 3x16 min - Turbulence Maxi

Published by 153 on June 12, 2012 at 01:13 a.m..
M42 - Pentax K5 iso80 = 3x8 + 3x16min - Dima 254/1200
m 42 80 iso

taken on Monday DD MMMMMM 2011 from Marseille 13 Fr
- [ K-5 Camera ]
Pentax K-5 ISO 80 = 3x8+3x16 minutes Exposures :
from Pentax K-5 Astro Makeup to final Orion image
- [ Lens ]
SkyWatcher 254 / 1200 Newtonian2 Reflector :
Lenses, Newtonians, RCTs, SCTs to take Orion subs

M42 Orion - Pentax K5 iso80 = 3x8+3x16 minutes
foyer Reflecteur Proto DIMA 254/1200
HEQ5 Goto-Kit + PhD Auto-Guide / Chercheur
Pris en Pleine Ville = Filtre Sky-Glow
DeepSkyStacker 6 PEF 3 Flat 0 Bias 0 Dark
Niveaux Accent Finit° Elements3
Turbulence Maxi (Mistral)

.

 

Your comments

astro reiky 13 year(s) 3 month(s) ago at 06:30
54 astro reiky great picture! I also tried some 80 ISO with K5 this summer. I still have to edit them. Do you think it is worth the H alpha conversion? redder nebulas like rosetta seem a bit pale...
Astro K-5 iso 80, Q-10 iso 1600 13 year(s) ago at 19:51
153 Astro K-5 iso 80, Q-10 iso 1600 Website « great picture ! Also tried some 80 ISO with K5 this summer. Still have to edit them »
- Thanks AstroReiky ! DeepSkyStacker works fine !
« Is it worth the H-Alpha Conversion ? redder nebulas like rosetta seem a bit pale... »
- IMO it is, if you do so, please post the How-To ! ;)
astro reiky 13 year(s) ago at 13:56
54 astro reiky I'm about to give up my search for pentax modification... Nobody seems to do it, and for some reasons I do not trust the only website where to do it. By the way, I just posted my first stack of just two images, a pale version of your M27, here on astronomic. Other images are on flickr, as astroreiky.
Astro K-5 iso 80, Q-10 iso 1600 12 year(s) 4 month(s) ago at 23:07
153 Astro K-5 iso 80, Q-10 iso 1600 Website Hi, IMO you don't need to modify P.K5, see here :
www.chassimages.com/forum/inde x.php/topic,118675.200.html
NGC-2237 shot this winter with Terrible Weather !
what do you think ?
Characters left: 1000